The Impact of Remote Urology Outpatient Clinics during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic of 2020 had a major impact on NHS services. From the 23rd of March 2020, the Urology Department in Basingstoke initiated telephone-led consultation clinics
instead of face-to-face outpatient appointments, in accordance with U.K. guidance.
Objectives: To evaluate patient experience and satisfaction following the introduction of remote (telephone) consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Patients and methods: The first 200 remote patient appointments between the 30th of March 2020 and the 16th of April 2020 were sent a postal questionnaire (19 questions relating to their experience and level of satisfaction with the interaction). Telephone consultations were conducted by 6 consultants, 3 registrars, and 2 specialist nurses. The patients were not prewarned to expect a questionnaire after the remote ap-pointment. The associated cost saving resulting from a switch from face-to-face appointments to remote telephone appointments was also calculated.
Results: 100 out of the 200 patients responded within 1 month (response rate 50%). A total of 44% of the patients were new referrals, while 56% were follow-ups. Overall, the feedback was positive regarding the telephone consultation, with 88% rating the care received as excellent or very good. In addition, 90% would recommend a telephone consultation to family and friends. However, 35% would prefer in the future to have another telephone consultation rather than face-to-face consultation, with 46% preferring a face-to-face appointment in the future and 19% unsure. For new patients, the proportion wishing to have a face-to-face appointment, in the end, was unsurprisingly higher than it was for those undergoing a follow-up (39% vs. 7 %). In these 2 weeks, the cost reduction to the NHS from shifting from face-to-face consultation to telephone consultation was estimated to be £6500.
Conclusions: Telephone urology clinics are a satisfactory alternative to face-to-face appointments for many of our patients now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. They are efficient, cost-effective, and feasible to undertake urological consultation and can be implemented successfully in selected patients. The feedback from this questionnaire would suggest that priority should be given to face-to-face appointments for new patients and for complex follow-up appointments. Telephone follow-up appointments, however, are a good approach for the majority of patients.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles published in all DPG titles is retained by the author(s). The author(s) grants DPG the rights to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. The author grants DPG exclusive commercial rights to the article. The author grants any party the rights to use the article freely for non-commercial purposes provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
2. Mehrabian A, Ferris SR. Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. J Consult Psychol. 1967.
3. Center for Connected Health Policy. What is Telehealth? Website. cchpca.org. 2018.
4. Public Health England. Guidance on social distancing for everyone in the U.K. Guid Soc distancing everyone U.K. 2020.
5. Chan MC, Yeo SEK, Chong YL, Lee YM. Stepping forward: Urologists’ efforts during the COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore. Eur Urol. 2020.
6. Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA, Prichard JS, Seymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. Br Med J. 1975.
7. Connor MJ, Miah S, Edison MA, Brittain J, Smith MK, Hanna M, et al. Clinical, fiscal and environmental benefits of a specialist-led virtual ureteric colic clinic: a prospective study. BJU Int. 2019.
8. Russell B, Liedberg F, Khan MS, Nair R, Thurairaja R, Malde S, et al. A Systematic review and meta-analysis of delay in radical cystectomy and the effect on survival in bladder cancer patients. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020.
9. Hanlon P, Chadwick F, Shah A, Wood R, Minton J, McCartney G, et al. COVID-19 – exploring the implications of long-term condition type and extent of multimorbidity on years of life lost: a modelling study. Wellcome Open Res. 2020.
10. Miah S, Dunford C, Edison M, Eldred-Evans D, Gan C, Shah TT, et al. A prospective clinical, cost and environmental analysis of a clinician-led virtual urology clinic. Annal Royal College Surg Engl. 2019.
11. Mayor S. NHS should bring in measures to reduce its carbon footprint, BMA says. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2008.
12. Vijayasundaram S, Karthikeyan P, Mehta SD. Proficiency of virtual follow-up amongst tinnitus patients who underwent intratympanic steroid therapy amidst COVID 19 pandemic. Am J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Med Surg. 2020.