Flexible Nephroscopy: A Step Towards Complete Stone Clearance in PCNL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives
To determine the usefulness of flexible nephroscopy after per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in detecting residual fragments.
Materials and Methods
A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2019 on patients undergoing standard PCNL using a flexible nephroscope to inspect all the calyces for residual stones. When residual stones were noted, either they were removed by basketing or by performing additional puncture to ensure complete clearance. Patients were followed up for 6 months and at the end of 1 month a plain CT KUB was done to look for residual fragments.
Results
The study cohort included 212 patients. Significant RFs were found in 28 patients during flexible nephroscopy and in two patients at 1 month follow up CT scan. All patients were stone free during 6 months follow up.
Conclusion
Flexible nephroscopy during PCNL decreases the chance of residual fragments and thereby reducing the chance of re-procedure rates.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of articles published in all DPG titles is retained by the author(s). The author(s) grants DPG the rights to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. The author grants DPG exclusive commercial rights to the article. The author grants any party the rights to use the article freely for non-commercial purposes provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
2. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0424
3. Streem SB, Yost A, Mascha E. Clinical implications of clinically insignificant store fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 1996;155:1186–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66208-6
4. Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM. Management of residual stones. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:347–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70263-9
5. Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK. Effectiveness of non-contrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2007;21:684–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ end.2006.0352
6. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Gupta A, Bensalah K, Cadeddu JA, Lotan Y, et al. Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 2009;181:1163–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. juro.2008.10.162
7. Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bell-man GC. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2001;58:345–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0090-4295(01)01225-0
8. Lim JK, HJ, Chung KH. Cost and effectiveness of different treatment options for renal calculi larger than 2 cm. Korean J Urol. 2002;43:454–8.
9. Lojanapiwat B. Previous open nephrolithotomy: Does it affect percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques and outcome? J Endourol. 2006;20:17–20. http://dx.doi. org/10.1089/end.2006.20.17
10. Pires C, Machet F, Dahmani L, Irani J, Dore B. Sensitivity of abdominal radiography without preparation compared with computed tomography in the assessment of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Prog Urol. 2003;13:581–4.
11. Denstedt JD, Clayman RV, Picus DD. Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Urol. 1991;145:703–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-5347(17)38429-X
12. Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Drake S, Holtz C, Rosenberg MS, Bretzke CA. Intraoperative fragment detection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Evaluation of high magnification rotational fluoroscopy combined with aggressive nephroscopy. J Urol. 2006;175:162–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00052-2